https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpBlMmGhNF0
The song "Imagine" by John Lennon poses many similarities to the topic of war. Throughout the song he is singing about how the world should stop making war and start making peace. When he says "Nothing to kill or die for, and no religion too. Imagine all the people, living life in peace" is talking about how if there were peace among all countries and religions, there wouldn't be a need to kill. Everyone would have the ability to live in peace. "Imagine no possessions, I wonder if you can. No need for greed or hunger. A brotherhood of man. Imagine all the people, sharing all the world" is describing how with peace there would be equality all around the world, which should be acknowledged. Overall, this song outlines how important it is to make peace as apposed to starting war.
Friday, 17 April 2015
Thursday, 16 April 2015
ISU blog post
http://www.medicinenet.com/autism_and_communication/page2.htm#how_does_autism_impact_the_family
Wednesday, 1 April 2015
Sniper News Report
June 1st,
1922
Civil
War Tears Family Ties
War
Between Brothers
On
a June night, the battle between the Republicans and The Free Staters
continued as the conflict occurred between two brothers. This took
place in Dublin during nightfall. The sniper posts himself on a
rooftop where is the place that all the catastrophe occurs.
The
conflict begins as the sniper see's an armoured car at which he fires
his riffle at the old woman and the informer that were in sight.
A
plan to take down his enemy occurs to him which he executes soon
after he has been shot in the arm by the opposing side. The sniper
quickly tries healing his wound and is prepared to take down his
enemy.
Now
that the opposing side thought the sniper was dead he quickly aimed
and shot the Free Stater with his revolver, defeating his enemy.
Soon
after the sniper curiously goes across the street to see who he
kills, only to be staring into the eyes of his own brother. This was
not only a Civil War but a war between a family.
Friday, 27 March 2015
Autism Slam Poetry
In this poem I am speaking in the point of view of someone with autism because a character in my ISU novel has autism.
They will never fully understand why I am so quiet,
Outspoken without speaking at all.
Small talk is the only talk I know,
I can never seem to want to let a conversation flow.
They call it a complex developmental disability,
Yet they don't understand my ability.
To deeply love the one thing I am good at,
Without being good at too much.
People don't understand me,
They think I can't feel.
Just because I don't show my emotions,
Doesn't mean I'm not real.
A myth, I tell you,
I am just like the rest.
They will never fully understand why I am so quiet,
Outspoken without speaking at all.
Small talk is the only talk I know,
I can never seem to want to let a conversation flow.
They call it a complex developmental disability,
Yet they don't understand my ability.
To deeply love the one thing I am good at,
Without being good at too much.
People don't understand me,
They think I can't feel.
Just because I don't show my emotions,
Doesn't mean I'm not real.
A myth, I tell you,
I am just like the rest.
Thursday, 12 March 2015
Poem for My ISU Novel
http://www.karensscrapsandgraphics.com/poetry/lboy.htm
This poem represents the prominent social issue in the novel "Dear John." Although John's father is not necessarily "little" as the poem is talking about a little boy, autism is a disorder that is present from early childhood. John's father has always kept their conversations to a minimum. Being a single parent, he raised John alone and they have always had a weak relationship. His passion for coins is all he ever converses with John or anyone about. John's father is a very alienated man from the rest of society. Now Savannah, John's new love interest, help's John understand that the reason why John's father has always been like that is because he has autism. Autism is a mental condition, characterized by difficulty in communicating and forming relationships and using abstract concepts. This impaired social interaction has resulted in John and his father's weak relationship for the course of John's life. This has effected his life drastically.
This poem represents the prominent social issue in the novel "Dear John." Although John's father is not necessarily "little" as the poem is talking about a little boy, autism is a disorder that is present from early childhood. John's father has always kept their conversations to a minimum. Being a single parent, he raised John alone and they have always had a weak relationship. His passion for coins is all he ever converses with John or anyone about. John's father is a very alienated man from the rest of society. Now Savannah, John's new love interest, help's John understand that the reason why John's father has always been like that is because he has autism. Autism is a mental condition, characterized by difficulty in communicating and forming relationships and using abstract concepts. This impaired social interaction has resulted in John and his father's weak relationship for the course of John's life. This has effected his life drastically.
Sunday, 1 March 2015
The boy in the striped pyjamas- Retell Reflect Relate
Retell Reflect Relate
The boy in the striped pyjamas is a story about the friendship between a young German boy named Bruno and a Jewish concentration camp prisoner, Shmuel, who is also around the same age. Bruno and his family are far more privileged because of his father's high position as a Nazi commandant. Bruno's father has been promoted and the family moves. Bored and wandering for an adventure, Bruno comes across a nearby farm, however his parents refuse to discuss it. His mother was not aware of what the father was doing exactly, which led her to become more naive. Bruno's sister is also very naive to everything occurring around her, due to how privileged she is to not have to see the harsh realities of the war. Bruno ends up near the barbed wire fence. Soon after, the two boys become closer as their friendship grows. Bruno gives Shmuel a piece of cake and Shmuel is accused of stealing after, which resulted in severe punishment. Bruno returned to where the two boys played on opposite sides of the fence and Shmuel didn't show up for a couple of days. Soon after Bruno apologizes for not speaking up about how Shmuel did not steal that day. This emphasizes how Bruno is nothing like his father. When Bruno's father announces that the children will be moving with their mother, Bruno uses a shovel to reach to the other side of the fence and Shmuel brings an extra pair of pyjamas so Bruno will blend in. Around this time, Bruno's family realize he's missing and search for him. The two boys are led to what they were told to be showers, with the other concentration camp prisoners and are gassed.
I believe this movie was a visual representation of what the world is teaching children, and when they're taught something right someone will always protest against it. Also, that children's innocence is their only advantage in society and that every child should have a voice. This is shown when Bruno befriends Shmuel, as he looks at him as an equal. The movie prominently showed how evil lives inside everyone, and one's appearance may not look evil but they are indeed capable of doing evil things. However, one of the characters still values the life of someone "below" him. A sense of humanity is restored during the course of the two boy's' friendship.
I can relate the movie to ISIS, because they're teaching children as young as the age of 6 how to behead people and fire AK-47's. Although they are protecting the rights of their religion it is still similar to the movie because children are growing up thinking that violence and evil is an appropriate way of solving problems. Children are basically growing up mindless and not being able to speak using their own voice. The training is said to be brainwashing the children and many of the children were also brainwashed in the movie, including Bruno's sister who did not care about much of what was going on because of how privileged she was.
The boy in the striped pyjamas is a story about the friendship between a young German boy named Bruno and a Jewish concentration camp prisoner, Shmuel, who is also around the same age. Bruno and his family are far more privileged because of his father's high position as a Nazi commandant. Bruno's father has been promoted and the family moves. Bored and wandering for an adventure, Bruno comes across a nearby farm, however his parents refuse to discuss it. His mother was not aware of what the father was doing exactly, which led her to become more naive. Bruno's sister is also very naive to everything occurring around her, due to how privileged she is to not have to see the harsh realities of the war. Bruno ends up near the barbed wire fence. Soon after, the two boys become closer as their friendship grows. Bruno gives Shmuel a piece of cake and Shmuel is accused of stealing after, which resulted in severe punishment. Bruno returned to where the two boys played on opposite sides of the fence and Shmuel didn't show up for a couple of days. Soon after Bruno apologizes for not speaking up about how Shmuel did not steal that day. This emphasizes how Bruno is nothing like his father. When Bruno's father announces that the children will be moving with their mother, Bruno uses a shovel to reach to the other side of the fence and Shmuel brings an extra pair of pyjamas so Bruno will blend in. Around this time, Bruno's family realize he's missing and search for him. The two boys are led to what they were told to be showers, with the other concentration camp prisoners and are gassed.
I believe this movie was a visual representation of what the world is teaching children, and when they're taught something right someone will always protest against it. Also, that children's innocence is their only advantage in society and that every child should have a voice. This is shown when Bruno befriends Shmuel, as he looks at him as an equal. The movie prominently showed how evil lives inside everyone, and one's appearance may not look evil but they are indeed capable of doing evil things. However, one of the characters still values the life of someone "below" him. A sense of humanity is restored during the course of the two boy's' friendship.
I can relate the movie to ISIS, because they're teaching children as young as the age of 6 how to behead people and fire AK-47's. Although they are protecting the rights of their religion it is still similar to the movie because children are growing up thinking that violence and evil is an appropriate way of solving problems. Children are basically growing up mindless and not being able to speak using their own voice. The training is said to be brainwashing the children and many of the children were also brainwashed in the movie, including Bruno's sister who did not care about much of what was going on because of how privileged she was.
Monday, 16 February 2015
Teaching Kids to Kill
Concepts: Some key concepts that are formed by this text are that video games are contributing to the mindlessness of mass culture. This is a theme that is present throughout the text as video games are causing people (mainly young) to not think for themselves. Also people are receiving pleasure from killing which is problematic. Another concept that is present in the text is how soldiers are trained and have to see first hand human brutality at it's greatest extent.
Connections: A connection that can be made within this text is the effects of video games on everyone using it. In the text they are portraying the idea that video games brainwash people to act violently, however in many cases this is not true. I've seen people play violent video games before and it hasn't caused them to act aggressively or in an inappropriate manner.
Challenges: The text is presenting the idea that video games causes people to act in a harmful manner, which is not always true. This creates a bias assumption because the juvenile crime rate is not necessarily caused by video games, much of it depends on the person committing the crime in general and not what they occupy their time doing. An easy solution to this problem would be for parents to not buy video games if it is causing a change in behaviour for their child.
Changes: Changes that are being suggested by the text are a change in how young people occupy their time basically. Since the author believes video games are causing violent behaviour in kids, they are portraying the idea that video games containing violence should just be banned. This is a bias point of view because kids may find joy in playing these games and may not even act violent at all. Also they could continue to be harmless for the rest of their lives.
Connections: A connection that can be made within this text is the effects of video games on everyone using it. In the text they are portraying the idea that video games brainwash people to act violently, however in many cases this is not true. I've seen people play violent video games before and it hasn't caused them to act aggressively or in an inappropriate manner.
Challenges: The text is presenting the idea that video games causes people to act in a harmful manner, which is not always true. This creates a bias assumption because the juvenile crime rate is not necessarily caused by video games, much of it depends on the person committing the crime in general and not what they occupy their time doing. An easy solution to this problem would be for parents to not buy video games if it is causing a change in behaviour for their child.
Changes: Changes that are being suggested by the text are a change in how young people occupy their time basically. Since the author believes video games are causing violent behaviour in kids, they are portraying the idea that video games containing violence should just be banned. This is a bias point of view because kids may find joy in playing these games and may not even act violent at all. Also they could continue to be harmless for the rest of their lives.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
